Learning with the Brain in Mind (Part 2)

In Part 1, we shared some facts about the Brain to remember, when we are harnessing the Brain/Mind connection during learning. This blog will look at the Mind; the other & no-less important half of the equation.
In our work with schools and training departments of corporate organisations, we often encounter teachers and training managers who recognise that the same lesson or training module can be received differently by different classes and groups. This can be frustrating for teachers and trainers, as learning objectives do not get achieved and if they can't identify the reason behind it. For the corporate organisation, it often means that operations and bottom-line considerations get affected when staff don't return from training with better skills. Conversely, the feeling of frustration is also true for students and participants who feel that the lesson is less-than-satisfying.
While each person's brain is physiologically identical, deep differences exist at the psychological level. In learning situations, these differences show themselves in individual preferences towards:
- the kind of information desired - eg facts or anecdotes or information gained from hands-on work
- the way the information is delivered - eg lecture or group work or humourous instructors
- the environment - eg the volume of ambient noise, the brightness of the room, the time of the lesson
- Analytical Learning - The Analytical Learner prefers mental analysis and logical deduction based on factual information
- Structural Learning - The Structural Learner prefers sequenced and ordered thinking.
- Social Learning - The Social Learner prefers group work and views information related to people as especially valuable
- Conceptual Learning - The Conceptual Learner prefers information presented in concepts, whose relationship to each other is shown
- Brain Dominance theory offers a vocabulary to explain differences in learning
- Using the Whole Brain framework, they can design lessons or training modules which align with the participants' learning preferences
- Because instruction can become more learner-centred, lessons or training sessions are more meaningful
- Teachers and training managers can be a catalyst for participants' growth, as they can systematically devote resources to 'strengthen' their least desired learning preferences
- identifying student or participant learning preferences from the Whole Brain perspective
- customising current training materials with Whole Brain input
- equipping teachers and trainers to 'Whole Brain' their instructional delivery
- devising Whole Brain pedagogies for maximum return from the investment into learning preferences assessment
Noel Tan
Resident Philosopher
(All text is copyright of Trailblazer Trainers Pte Ltd.)